Are You a Taxpayer or a Shareholder?
Lisa | Feb 18, 2009 | Comments 3
Yes, this is a trick question. Millions of Americans, of course, are both, whether we like it or not. And we have our dismal 401k balances to prove it.
If you don’t have a 401k, come out of the cave and get one. If you ever want to retire, you have no choice. And if you’re not paying taxes, e-mail me the details on how you’re managing that.
So here I am, taxpayer and shareholder, $847 billion dollars later, again - because didn’t we just do this? - scratching my head, wondering why all of these supposedly really smart economists think it’s right to keep pouring non-existent tax money into the pockets of those same financial wizards that tanked all the banks in the first place.
We should be firing them, and prosecuting them, but here we are giving them another carte blanche. I wish my boss was that stupid.
NPR’s interview with Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz today discusses the merits of banks being nationally rather than privately run. He says that Americans are handing over the money to pay the bills, but we have no control over which bills - if any - are getting paid.
It’s like giving your teenager lunch money. Who knows where it will end up. But if you kept the money and packed his lunch, you’d have a better chance of him eating it.
I agree with Stiglitz - in that it would give the government control of where their money is going. But will that make things better? There’s graft and corruption in government run as while as privately run businesses.
Stiglitz is missing the boat on the true problem here: that there’s no business ethics, or values, or integrity to be had out there. And that without heavy regulation, and control, this will keep happening.
Shysters will always be shysters. And without protection, the smart honest people will have to play the shyster’s game, or they’ll sink.
Do you think the USA government should take over the banks?
photo credit: PicApp
Related Posts
Related Websites - More Love than Tough Love for Pork Senator Ted Stevens? Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was indicted this week on multiple corruption charges involving failure to disclose benefits he received from government contractors. Stevens is...
- The credit crisis video The Crisis of Credit Visualized from Jonathan Jarvis on Vimeo. This video about our current economic crisis has been bouncing around the internet for quite...
- Weekend Links - Tax Questions Answered Edition HR Block sent me a link to a promotion that they are running. Specifically they are allowing you to ask a tax advisor questions for...
Filed Under: Commentary • Economy



























Probably. But for this to happen, things will have to become much worse, and because of this latest plan, if things get worse then the limited government intervention will be seen as the reason. We’re pretty much in a lose-lose here. (unless the stimulus plan works, of course).
OXM´s last blog post..Running 5 miles (in public)
I’m not sure heavy regulation is what we need. It seems that the housing market is what started this mess. While many blame Wall St. and the lack of regulation, it may have been regulation that got us in the mess to start with. If we had no interest deduction for mortgages (gov’t regulation) and if Greenspan had not implemented a ridiculous monetary policy that sent interest rates to historic lows (more gov’t regulations), we wouldn’t have had the housing bubble or the current crash, IMO.
David´s last blog post..AdvanceMe Review
Really like your blog. And I totally agree with all your thoughts. Why are we refinancing all the rich people. It is nuts. And no, I don’t think the government should take over the banks. I believe that would make things worse.